Opinion: Why do I think that the regulations of the Spanish “Crea y Crece” Law should NOT incorporate EDIFACT as a format for e-invoicing?

The Spanish Government’s draft for electronic invoices in Spain includes four formats: UBL, CII, XML Facturae, and EDIFACT.
However, there are several reasons why EDIFACT should not be included. Firstly, it goes against the criteria of the European Committee for Standardization and was discarded by the European Commission.
Secondly, it contradicts the criteria established by Law 25/2013 and Order PRE/2971/2007.
Thirdly, it will be replaced by the ViDA project, which establishes a real-time system based on electronic invoices.
Additionally, the subset of EDIFACT used in Spain, EANCOM®, is no longer being developed by its creator, GS1.
Furthermore, EDIFACT is the only format that uses a syntax different from XML, making it technologically complicated and costly.
Its adoption also increases costs for SMEs. Finally, the NHS in the UK has already replaced EDI with UBL exchanges through Peppol.