A bv produces and sells skin care products. It applies the 9% rate. The inspector considers that this rate does not apply to these resources and imposes a VAT additional assessment. The Supreme Court rules that EU member states may selectively apply the 9% rate, unless this is contrary to the principle of neutrality. The OB Act distinguishes between registered medicines (9% rate) and medical devices (21% rate). The bv’s skin care products fall into the category of medical devices. But does this distinction lead to a violation of the principle of neutrality?
Source: www.fiscount.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Submitted audit files in the event of multiple tax fraud do not fall under informal privilege of advisers
- No VAT Deduction for Invoices After Third-Party Attachment in Transport BV Case
- Amsterdam Court: Compensable VAT May Be Included in Municipal Levy Cost Calculations
- No Right to VAT Deduction for Invoiced Services Without Proof of Supply
- Compensable VAT in Municipal Fees Does Not Breach Revenue Limit
