The High Court of Bombay has held that the State Tax Officer (STO) does not have the jurisdiction to issue communication under Section 83 of the Maharastra Goods and Services Tax (MGST) Act, 2017. The STO voluntarily withdrew the communication and Bombay HC disposed the Writ Petition in consequent to the withdrawal.
Source: www.taxscan.in
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court to Decide if Industrial Felt is ‘Fabric’ or ‘Machinery Part’ for VAT Purposes
- Supreme Court Rules: “Parts” Must Functionally Integrate into Machinery, Rejecting End-Use Claims
- Centre to Consider Panel’s GST Recommendations on Air Purifiers, Tells Delhi High Court
- Sunglasses Not Classified as Spectacles, Taxable at Higher 12.5% VAT: Punjab & Haryana HC
- BMW Urges No GST Hike on EVs as Electric Car Sales Surge Over 200% in 2025
