The Court of Appeals added to the District Court’s ruling that although the magic truffles contained essential nutrients, they were exclusively consumed for a purpose other than ingesting those nutrients. Magic truffles were solely consumed for their hallucinogenic effects. Due to these effects, magic truffles could only be consumed in small quantities, making the intake of necessary nutrients negligible. As a result, magic truffles were not similar to the products with which Company X compared them.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Dutch Supreme Court Refers Key VAT Real Estate Questions to CJEU, Creating Market Uncertainty
- Dispute Over VAT on Final Payment for Business Transfer and Software Use Agreement, Arnhem-Leeuwarden Court 2025
- Supreme Court Confirms: No Destruction of Ruling; No Mediation or Foreign Establishment Proven
- General Court Excise T-690/24 (Kolinsen) – Judgment – Member State of arrival competent to levy excise duty in the event of irregularity detected on arrival
- Dutch Court Denies VAT Deduction for Crypto Platform Over Lack of Direct Service to Non-EU Clients
