The CESTAT, Mumbai, in M/s Bajaj Finance Ltd. v Commissioner of Central Excise and GST [Service Tax Appeal No. 90043 of 2018 dated August 07, 2023] set aside the impugned order and held that the assessee is not receiving penal interest and bouncing charges as a consideration for tolerating an act. Thus, service tax cannot be demanded.
Source a2ztaxcorp
Latest Posts in "India"
- Supreme Court to Decide if Industrial Felt is ‘Fabric’ or ‘Machinery Part’ for VAT Purposes
- Supreme Court Rules: “Parts” Must Functionally Integrate into Machinery, Rejecting End-Use Claims
- Centre to Consider Panel’s GST Recommendations on Air Purifiers, Tells Delhi High Court
- Sunglasses Not Classified as Spectacles, Taxable at Higher 12.5% VAT: Punjab & Haryana HC
- BMW Urges No GST Hike on EVs as Electric Car Sales Surge Over 200% in 2025
