- The District Court of Gelderland has ruled that X BV, a company focused on providing support to sports clubs and athletes, can rightfully invoke the Rompelman judgment as a ‘start-up’.
- The company’s preparatory work can be considered economic activities. X BV’s VAT deduction of €40,044 was disputed by the inspector who claimed that the company was a pure holding company and not a VAT entrepreneur.
- However, the court ruled in favor of X BV, stating that it is not a pure holding company as it has been managing the group from the start and is involved in marketing, sales, personnel policy, intellectual property acquisition, and customer acquisition.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
- Dutch Tax Law Clarifies Data Reporting Rules for Small Business Scheme
- Tax Fraud Lessons: The Perils of Mixing Business and Personal Finances
- Entrepreneur Bound by Settlement Agreement in Tax Reassessment Case on Luxury Watches Sales
- Financial Application Disruption at Customs Halts Payments, Urgent Payment Requests Possible
