- The case concerns the second hand margin scheme for art and the taxable amount under Article 315 of the VAT Directive.
- The Court clarified that the taxable dealer’s profit margin is the difference between the selling price and the purchase price, which includes everything that constitutes consideration obtained from the supplier.
- The purchase price does not include the cost elements that the taxable dealer has not paid to the supplier, such as the acquisition VAT paid by the dealer.
- The Court cannot depart from the clear and precise wording of the VAT Directive, and therefore, the VAT paid by a taxable dealer for intra-Community acquisition of a work of art forms part of the taxable amount of that supply.
Source KPMG
See also
- Summary of ECJ C-180/22 (Mensing) – VAT paid on intra-EU acquisition is to be included in taxable amount under profit margin scheme
- C-180/22 (Mensing) – Judgment – VAT paid on intra-EU acquisition is to be included in taxable amount under profit margin scheme
- C-264/17 (Mensing) – Judgment – Margin scheme on works of art; right to deduct input VAT by taxable dealer
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU AG: Separate Legal Entities Must Act Independently to Be Separate VAT Taxable Persons
- CJEU Rules on VAT Deduction Denial and Taxation of VAT Refund Services in Hungary
- EU Advances Customs Reform with Central Authority and Unified Data Hub System
- Essential Steps for Multi-Country EU VAT Registration: Triggers, Documentation, and Compliance Tips
- ECJ VAT C-544/24 (Nekilnojamojo turto valdymas) – AG Opinion – National law’s fixed late payment interest aligns with EU law
