The court’s ruling from July 11 and published on Monday, said that although in law the company was entitled to certain tax privileges, the relevant records were “miserably bereft of any proof of the date of the filing of VAT returns and payment of the VAT purportedly passed on to the petitioner [Melco Resorts Leisure] by its suppliers”.
Source: ggrasia.com
Latest Posts in "Philippines"
- AstraZeneca Secures ₱37M VAT Refund from BIR for Exempted Medicine Imports
- Philippine Court Grants Partial VAT Refund to AstraZeneca Subsidiary for 2020 Drug Imports
- Philippines Launches VAT Portal for Non-Resident Digital Service Providers to Enhance Compliance
- Philippines Faces Potential Tariffs as Trump Targets Countries with Digital Taxes
- Philippines Announces VAT Exemption on Medicines to Lower Healthcare Costs and Improve Access
