Although there may have been a beneficial psychological impact on undergoing such treatments and this may have been the reason for a patient to proceed (and they may be recommended by qualified medical professionals) this, in itself, was insufficient to persuade the judge that the services were exempt. Consequety, the appeal was rejected and the assessment was upheld.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Employment Agency’s Reimbursed Medical Staff Costs Not Exempt from VAT, Tribunal Rules
- VAT Exemption for Welfare Services Applies to Both English and Welsh Operations, Tribunal Rules
- HMRC Updates VAT Deduction Rules for Overseas Insurance Intermediary Services After Tribunal Decision
- Common VAT Payment Issues: Questions, Penalties, and Solutions for Businesses in Financial Difficulty
- MPs Call on Chancellor to Cut VAT and Business Rates for Pubs and Restaurants
