- The court declares X’s appeals inadmissible because X falls under the mass objection procedure for box 3, on which a decision was made in July 2019.
- X had previously lodged an objection against IB/PVV 2015 and 2016 attacks, but the objection fell under the mass objection procedure for box 3.
- X can only appeal after receiving an individual decision on the objection, but X never applied for one.
- The court concludes that X’s objection falls under the mass objection procedure, and the fact that the Supreme Court’s judgment on box 3 relates to other tax years is irrelevant.
- Therefore, the court declares X’s appeals inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Zero rate refused at car dealer due to inadequate evidence
- No deduction of input tax for legal expenses of DGA
- Bill to Implement EU VAT in the Digital Age Directive: Single VAT Registration Provisions
- Sale of Building Plots Is a VAT-Taxable Business Activity, Not a Private Transaction, Court Rules
- Registration fees of victims of a lottery compensation for services for consideration
