This ruling concerns the interpretation of Art. 311 (1) no. 1 of the VAT Direction. It has been issued in the course of a legal dispute between IT and the Belgian state regarding the refusal of the Belgian tax authorities to apply margin taxation to certain sales of vehicles carried out by IT.
Source KPMG
See also
- Summary of ECJ C-365/22: Definitively end-of-life motor vehicles acquired by an undertaking and intended to be sold “for parts” without removing any parts are considered second-hand good
- ECJ C-365/22 (Belgian State) – Judgment – Purchase of end-of life motor vehicles which are intended to be sold ‘for parts’ constitute second-hand goods
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Guide: Disbursements vs Recharges Classification and Tax Implications
- Hungary’s Carbon Tax Conflicts with EU Emissions Trading System Directive 2003/87
- EU VAT Compliance: B2C Distance Sales Rules and €10,000 Threshold Guide
- EU Parliament Backs Tax Code Simplification to Boost Economic Growth
- Roadtrip through ECJ Cases – Focus on “Liability to pay VAT – VAT shall be payable by any person who enters the VAT on an invoice” (Art. 203)
