The Upper Tribunal (UT) case of CPR Commercials Limited [2023] UKUT 61(TCC) has highlighted the importance difference between deliberate errors and careless errors within the context of VAT penalties.The appellant sold used commercial vehicles to customers including VAT registered businesses in Ireland. It charged the zero-rate of VAT on those supplies to Ireland on the basis the vehicles had been removed from the UK.
Source: saffery.com
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Interest Payable on VAT Element of Commercial Debt Under Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998
- Addressing Unfair VAT Repayment and Interest Rates: CIOT and ATT Autumn Budget 2025 Representation
- UK Tribunal Clarifies Input VAT Deductions and HMRC Discretion Under VAT Regulations 1995
- UK Tribunal Rules Company Cannot Reclaim Input VAT Due to Pre-Registration Purchases and Invalid Invoices
- Permission to Make Late VAT Appeal Refused: Choudhury v HMRC, Martland and Katib Applied
