The Court of Amsterdam ruled that X, as de facto manager of the BV, was guilty of deliberately submitting incorrect VAT returns. He personally passed on the data to the administrative office and also signed one written declaration himself.
Source: taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
