VOF A, a partnership selling flowers, was charged with additional VAT and penalties after a due diligence. The court ruled that certain costs were not eligible for VAT deduction, and documents only need to be submitted if relevant to the assessment of points of dispute on appeal. The taxpayer must have access to the same information as the Tax and Customs Administration for equality of arms.
Source BTW jurisprudentie
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Liability of Dutch Kadaster’s Tactical Management Services for DSO-LV under Economic Activity Criteria
- Court Divided on VAT Abuse: Car Sales to Directors at Below-Market Prices and Tax Implications
- Dutch Supreme Court: Abuse of Law in VAT on Underpriced Car Sale by Holding Company to DGA
- Dutch Supreme Court Rejects VAT Refund Appeal; Lower Court Ruling Upheld Without Further Explanation
- Netherlands Raises VAT on Short-Stay Accommodation to 21% Effective January 2026
