In a case involving a VAT group (FE) that leases machinery and properties, the son of the sole shareholder and director of the FE has a company engaged in metal galvanization. This company transfers its movable assets to the FE and charges VAT for the transaction. The movable assets are then immediately leased back to the company and used by them, essentially maintaining the same business operations. The FE claims VAT deduction, but the tax inspector argues that it constitutes a transfer of a going concern. The Zeeland-West-Brabant Court does not agree with the inspector’s position.
Source: fiscount.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
