On 16 February 2023, the CJ delivered its judgment in the case ASA (C-519/21). ASA and PP owned a plot of land in Romania. ASA and PP entered into an association agreement with BP and BM with the aim of developing residential properties on the plot of land. ASA, PP, BP and BM are natural persons. The association agreement stipulated that 33.33% and 66.67% respectively of the sales proceeds would be attributed to ASA / PP and BP / BM. All construction costs would be paid by BP and BM.
Source Loyens Loeff
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
- For an overview of ECJ cases per article of the EU VAT Directive, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-515/24: ECJ Upholds Spanish VAT Deduction Ban for Entertainment Expenses at Accession
- EU Court Clarifies VAT Deduction Rights, Limits Formal Barriers in Key 2026 Rulings
- Comments on ECJ case C‑436/24: Loyalty Points and In-Game Currencies Are Not Vouchers for VAT Purposes
- Online Workshop: Simplifying EU Excise Procedures – Share Experiences and Propose Solutions
- Comments on ECJ Cases C-409/24 bis C-411/24: Separate VAT Rates for Hotel Services and Ancillary Benefits in Germany
