The Supreme Court recently ruled in a case in which an auction house auctioned used household goods, art and antiques and the like and charged a fee for this to both the seller (commission) and the buyer (buyer). It follows from this judgment that an auction house owes VAT on both the commissions and the premiums it charges.
Source BTW Instituut
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Management Services for CDC Pension Fund: Not a Common Investment Fund, Appeal Dismissed
- Court Upholds Fine for Late VAT Filing; Objection Partially Granted, Penalty Deemed Appropriate
- VAT Zero Rate Denied for Export of Horse Shares: Appeal Unsuccessful, Tax Assessment Upheld
- VAT Exemption Denied for Services to Pension Funds with CDC and DC Schemes, Court Rules
- VAT Exemption for Pension Fund Management: Distinction Between Accumulation and Payout Phases Disputed
