The judge found to be unambiguous the (now amended) provision allowing UK taxpayers to charge VAT on a discounted price even where the full price was received, and felt that it would exceed the boundaries of interpretation if it gave that provision an EU law-consistent meaning (which would in any case require VAT to be paid on the actual consideration received).
Source Fabian Barth
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Guernsey Seeks Companies to Support New GST Administration, Tender Deadline Approaches
- Navigating UK VAT: Key Considerations and Pitfalls in Exporting Goods
- HMRC’s New VAT Error Correction Rules: Stricter Penalties and Reporting Changes Explained
- UK Supreme Court Confirms VAT on Intragroup Fees for Former VAT Group Members
- Supreme Court Clarifies VAT Grouping and Time of Supply Rules in Prudential Assurance Case
