In its opinion, the Court has only involved the sale and delivery of the new building. If the Court assumed that only this sale and transfer should be taken into account, even if they form part of a set of legal acts, it would have erred in law. If the Court has assumed the correct view of law, these judgments are insufficiently substantiated since the Court has not thereby shown that it has taken into account the essential argument put forward by the Inspector regarding the review of the combination of transactions in its assessment.
Source: nlfiscaal.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
- VAT Implications for ‘Free’ Online Services: Legal Challenges and Potential Impact on SMEs
- Court Denies Tax Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs as Private Expenses
- No deduction of input tax for private advisory fees shareholders
