The Delhi Bench of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) held that importer is liable for making forged imports. And penalty under section 114 A was charged against the importer. Shri S.C. Jain Advocate appeared for the Appellant and Shri Rakesh Kumar appeared for the Department. In the instant case,2 appeals assailing…
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- VAT Pre-Deposit Refund Must Be Paid in Cash Under GST, Rules Madras High Court
- Karnataka High Court: Limitation for GST Refund Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- Karnataka High Court: GST Refund Limitation Mandatory, Delay Condonable Under Writ Jurisdiction
- GST Refund Limitation is Mandatory, but High Courts Can Condon Delay in Genuine Hardship Cases
- DGFT Tightens Certificates of Origin Rules, Mandates Automated Verification and Authorised Issuance
