Whilst only providing guidance to the referring Court in summary the AG considered that the Municipality could be making supplies to the resident for consideration. However, the asbestos removal programme is probably not an economic activity and even if it is, the Municipality should be treated as a non-taxable person under Article 13.
Source KPMG
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, clickHERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Announces VAT Digital Age Implementation Strategy to Combat Fraud and Modernize System
- ECJ Rules on VAT Treatment of Mobile App Services Before 2015
- EPPO Indicts 36 Suspects in €24.3 Million VAT Fraud Scheme
- EU Court Rules on VAT Liability for App Store Digital Platform Sales
- EU’s ViDA in Motion: How EU Member States Are Preparing for implementing Digital Reporting Requirements (DRR)
