The court rules that the plaintiff does not owe any reverse charge tax on the services of the American company. This is because the services of this company can be regarded as brokerage in securities for which the exemption of Article 11, first paragraph, letter i, second, of the VAT Act applies.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Free Social Media Access Still Uncertain Amid Ongoing EU Discussions
- New DAC7 Portal for Reporting Platform Seller Data Available from February 2026
- BBB Criticizes ‘Tulip Tax’: Higher VAT on Floriculture Threatens Jobs and Affordability
- Netherlands Delays VAT on ‘Free’ Social Media Services Amid European Debate and Legal Uncertainty
- Parliamentary Questions on VAT for Social Media: Response to FD Article and European Developments
