The court rules that the plaintiff does not owe any reverse charge tax on the services of the American company. This is because the services of this company can be regarded as brokerage in securities for which the exemption of Article 11, first paragraph, letter i, second, of the VAT Act applies.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No rental-plus in case of subletting to conservatory
- Knowledge group: rental of solar roof project does not qualify as rental of immovable property
- Agricultural standards for VAT for private use 2025 in last VAT return 2025
- Annual VAT Corrections in the Netherlands: Understanding the BUA and Private Consumption Rules
- Follow-up Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation: Dutch Senate Finance Committee
