Advocate General Rantos concludes that art. 9a EU Implementing Regulation 282/2011 is valid. Indeed, this provision takes into account the essential general objectives of art. 28 VAT Directive and is necessary or useful for the implementation of that article.
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU and Indonesia conclude negotiations on free trade agreement
- ECJ Case: VAT Treatment of Loyalty Points vs Vouchers Under EU Directive
- FISC Hearing on Tax Implications of Trump Administration Policies September 23
- VAT Rules for Virtual Game Currencies: EU Court Advocate General Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: AG Opinion on Taxation of Virtual Gold in Online Gaming
