The Escape Center is a for-profit fitness center. It therefore has to charge VAT on its services. She had been doing this for years at the 21% VAT rate. For the period 2015-2018, she herself established that she had in fact paid too much VAT and claimed 15% VAT back (ie the difference between 21% and 6%). The tax authorities refused to apply the reduced VAT rate of 6% and so a lawsuit was filed.
The administration took its traditional position: admission is subject to 6% and individual supervision and group lessons are subject to 21%. It based this on the Belgian legal text (see below). If no division is made between access and guidance, the whole is subject to 21% VAT, according to the tax authorities.
Source VATconsult
Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ VAT Cases, click HERE
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU Parliament Approves CBAM Reforms: New 50-Ton Threshold, Delayed Certificate Purchases to 2027
- ViDA: Transforming EU VAT with Harmonized e-Invoicing and Real-Time Reporting
- EU Court Ruling on Arcomet: Transfer Pricing Adjustments Pose VAT Risks for Companies
- Italian Tax Authorities Remove Non-EU Companies from VIES for Failing New VAT Guarantee Requirements
- Comments on ECJ C-121/24: Non-payment of declared VAT does not constitute VAT fraud
