The Amsterdam Court of Appeal ruled that X has no right to deduct input VAT, since the documents submitted do not show that the partner’s invoices relate to work actually performed. The Supreme Court declares the appeal in cassation inadmissible.
Source Taxlive
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Zero Rate Denied for Horse Export to the United States
- VAT Margin Scheme on Pawned Goods Sale by Pledge House
- Dutch Court Upholds Timely VAT Reassessment Against Gym Partnership
- Medical VAT Exemption Applies to Independent Doctor’s Assistant
- Dutch Court Seeks Guidance on Criminal Liability in VAT Fraud Cases
