The Delhi High Court has held that penalty for mere expiry of an e-way bill is not justifiable when all documents produced except the reason for the delay in transportation of goods are not stated.
The petitioner was represented by Mr Rahul Gupta with Mr Rakesh Kumar and the respondent was represented by.The petitioner, Nirmal Kumar Mahaveer Kumar challenged the order dated 31.12.2021 passed by respondent no.2/Office of Appellate Authority (Delhi GST) which confirmed the demand raised by respondent no.3/Assistant Commissioner, Ward-112, Special Zone, Delhi, towards tax and penalty.
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- 56th GST Council meeting is scheduled for September 3rd and 4th, 2025
- Eight States Demand GST Rate Cuts Be Tied to Revenue Guarantee and Consumer Benefits
- CII Urges Corporates to Transfer GST Rate Cut Benefits to Consumers Before Festive Season
- DGFT Extends Export Obligation Period, Boosting Indian Textile Exporters’ Competitiveness
- GST 2.0: New Two-Slab Tax Regime Announced, Healthcare and Essentials to Get Cheaper
