HMRC keep taking cases on non-economic activity, looking to disallow large amounts of VAT on the grounds it is attributable to (used by) the non-economic activity even when it is clear, as here, that the non-economic activity (free services in this case) is done for a business purpose and to stimulate the generation of taxable income. This line of argument goes all the way back to the Imperial War Museum case (free admission for some people on some days) and of course more recently we have seen cases like Sveda, Ibedrola, ANL, Will Woodlands, Durham Cathedral etc.
Source KPMG
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Colleges Win £2.8 Million Tax Rebates Amid VAT Rule Dispute with HMRC
- Tribunal Rules on VAT Status of Government Grants for Free Educational Services by Colleges
- The UK Should Lower or Abolish, Not Raise, Its VAT Registration Threshold
- UK Should Lower or Abolish VAT Threshold to Boost Small Business Growth and Efficiency
- Lowering VAT Threshold Risks Breaching Labour’s Manifesto, Warns Self-Employed Association
