It is precisely X’s laconic reaction to the warning (formulated in a fairly general sense) and his laxity/negligence in taking his tax obligations in this respect seriously, according to the Court of Appeal, should have prompted B to take additional measures, all the more because the reaction of X, in any case, it clearly emerged that the border for making a declaration in Belgium had been exceeded. However, the Court agreed with B that the damage that had occurred was also the result of X’s own negligence, once warned, to arrange for VAT returns in Belgium or at least to provide B with the necessary information
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Belgium"
- VAT code 00 does not cover all possibilities in Peppol (UBL)In Belgium, you use code 00 for “no VAT”
- Belgium Postpones Implementation of the VAT Chain
- PwC Belgium: Tax Bites Podcast – DAC6
- Webinar pincvision: Belgium eInvoicing – All You Need to Know (Oct 2)
- Belgium Postpones VAT Provision Account Implementation Amidst Modernization Efforts
