VAT – Denial of input tax under the Kittel principle — whether appellant knew or should have known that the only reasonable explanation for the transactions was that they were connected with fraud – assessment of output tax under the Mecsek principle – whether the appellant knew or should have known that the transactions were part of a tax fraud committed by its purchaser, and that it had not taken every reasonable step within its power to prevent its own participation in that fraud
Source: bailii.org
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- UK Eases VAT Grouping Rules to Attract Foreign Investment and Simplify Cross-Border Compliance
- Tribunal Rules Bespoke Autobiography Books by Story Terrace Qualify for VAT Zero-Rating
- Full VAT Recovery Allowed on Product Photography Costs in Littlewoods v HMRC Tribunal Decision
- FTT Favors Commercial Reality Over Contract in VAT Reclaim Case on Truck Fuel and Repairs
- HMRC Updates VAT Exemption for Temporary Medical Staff After Isle of Wight Tribunal Decision
