Plaintiff acknowledged at the hearing that she sold phones, that the telecom providers paid the fee to her for this and that she should have paid VAT on this. In dispute is whether the defendant should have levied the VAT due not on the plaintiff but on the providers.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT and School Building Transfers: Economic Activity, Consideration, and Legal Certainty in Dutch Case Law
- New policy note on intermediation in share transactions
- No Excuse for Unpaid VAT Without Filing Invitation; Fine Upheld but Reduced to €1,500
- No VAT Deduction for Exempt Rental by Partnership to BV, Court Den Bosch 2025
- Penalty for payment of additional VAT assessment reduced due to incidental negligence
