The CESTAT, Chennai bench has held that there is no prohibition on the selling of goods by the importer to another to attract proceedings under section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962. The department, under an impression that the appellant, M/s Freight Link Logistics, was trying to evade customs duty, initiated proceedings. Show cause notice…
Source Taxscan
Latest Posts in "India"
- AAR Rules GST Applies to Small Packaged Shrimp Exports, Citing Retail Packaging Criteria
- Supreme Court to Decide if Leasehold Rights Transfer is Taxable Under GST Law
- Only Entity Named as Exporter in Customs Documents Can Claim Service Tax Refund: CESTAT
- CESTAT: Testing Services to Foreign Clients Qualify as ‘Export of Services’ under FTDR Act
- CESTAT Rules Dell India’s Services to Foreign Affiliates Qualify as Export, Allows Appeal
