European case law has repeatedly examined the concept of a “passive” fixed establishment in an attempt to determine its contours. The judgment commented on here adds to the debate:
- For a fixed establishment to exist, it is not necessary to have human or technical resources of one’s own. If these human or technical resources belong to a third party, it is necessary that the company has the power to use these resources as if they were its own.
- The same means cannot be used both to provide as well as to receive the same services
The sales representation and marketing services provided by the Romanian company are received by the German company, which then uses its own human and technical resources located in Germany to conclude and execute sales contracts with distributors of its products in Romania. Therefore, the German company does not have a permanent establishment in Romania.
Source vatdesk.eu
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- EU VAT Data Exchange Divides Members, Hindering Digital Tax Future
- Recent ECJ and General Court VAT Jurisprudence and Implications for EU Compliance – March 2026
- Comments on T-221/25: EU General Court confirms (former) Belgian VAT treatment of travel outside the EU
- Agenda of the ECJ/General Court VAT cases – 1 Judgment, 2 AG Opinions till April 30, 2026
- EU Courts Reshape Transfer Pricing’s Impact on Indirect Taxes
