X and the inspector disagreed on how to calculate the cost of private use, and also on whether the reduced VAT rate applied to use for private purposes. According to the Supreme Court, the private use could not be regarded as the provision of accommodation as referred to in item b.11 of Table I. This service presupposed that the owner of the vacation home had granted a third party the right to use the home to the exclusion of others for a specific period of time.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT Increase on Hotels Could Lead to Billions in Losses for Tourism Sector
- No VAT Deduction for Family Business Succession Advisory Costs, Court Rules Against A BV
- Proposed VAT Increase on Tourism Yields No Net Gain, Faces Parliamentary Vote
- Impact of 2027 Policy Change on Home Batteries and VAT for Solar Panel Owners
- Supreme Court to Decide Tax Status of Paved Parking Lot: Built or Unbuilt Land?
