Advocate General IJzerman argues that, although the interested party acted incorrectly, arguments can be made for the latter’s position that by including VAT debts in the corporate income tax return they have complied with the obligation to file a supplementary return.
Source Deloitte
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Adjustment of VAT deduction for services on immovable property: What can you still do?
- Government Responds to Questions on VAT Increase Impact Analysis for Accommodation
- Heijnen Maintains VAT Increase on Accommodation Despite Predicted Revenue Loss
- VAT due to number acquisition not deductible due to participation in fraud
- Dutch Government Responds to Questions on Reduced VAT for Culture Media Sports
