AG IJzerman is of the opinion that the formal approach of the State Secretary is in itself correct, but that X bv does have an arguable position in a material sense. The 50% offense fine of € 117,729 was therefore rightly annulled by the Court of Appeal.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- No Defensible Position for VAT Fraudster, Rules Advocate General Van Kempen in Tax Case
- Smoking Cessation Programs Not Exempt from VAT Due to Lack of Required Medical Qualifications
- Payment Not Considered Compensation for Transfer of Generality of Goods, Article 37d Not Applicable
- Reduced VAT Rate Applies to Live Events Featuring Online Communities and Streamers, Court Rules
- Court Lacks Jurisdiction Over VAT Refund Requests for 2018; 2019 Claim Also Denied
