A fine distinction is often required to be made to establish the correct VAT treatment of a supply. In this case a degree of semantics was required to determine whether the panels were energy-saving materials (even when they certainly saved energy). On such small things turned the assessment of £2.6 million here. It always pays to double check VAT treatments rather than making assumptions.
Source: marcusward.co
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Interest Payable on VAT Element of Commercial Debt Under Late Payment of Commercial Debts Act 1998
- Addressing Unfair VAT Repayment and Interest Rates: CIOT and ATT Autumn Budget 2025 Representation
- UK Tribunal Clarifies Input VAT Deductions and HMRC Discretion Under VAT Regulations 1995
- UK Tribunal Rules Company Cannot Reclaim Input VAT Due to Pre-Registration Purchases and Invalid Invoices
- Permission to Make Late VAT Appeal Refused: Choudhury v HMRC, Martland and Katib Applied
