Unofficial translation
The interested party, X bv, is being set up in connection with a new construction project of 162 owner-occupied homes. To this end, in 2010 X bv concluded an agreement with a purchase obligation with foundation A. The agreement states that X bv may offer unsold homes for sale to A and that A must then purchase these homes. X bv will consider this option in September 2013. It is disputed whether the VAT rate of 19% or 21% applies.
The ‘s-Hertogenbosch Court rules that the VAT rate of 21% applies. X bv did not exercise the put option before September 30, 2013. It was only then that it was established that X bv offered the unsold new-build homes for sale to A, that A was obliged to purchase them and accept their ownership upon delivery and that A had to conclude a sale/supply agreement with X bv for this purpose. The moment at which A was obliged to buy the unsold new-build homes from X bv and to accept them for delivery is after April 28, 2012. The delivery of the homes after September 30, 2013 will then not take place on the basis of an agreement concluded before April 28, 2012. so that the transitional arrangement does not apply. It equals the inspector.
Source Taxlive.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- ViDA E‑Invoicing and Digital Reporting in the Netherlands: Strategic Choices and Phased Timeline to 2032
- Amendments to VAT Compensation Fund Scheme for Investment Services Effective April 2026
- Court Rejects Proposed Settlement in VAT Fraud Case Due to Evidence and Sentence Concerns
- Dutch Tax Administration Update: Emergency VAT E-commerce Track Extended to 2028, Digital Mail Option in 2025
- Amendment to VAT Compensation Fund Rules for Investment Services Effective April 2026













