The Danish Tax Agency had submitted a binding answer, according to which the questioner’s advice on nod allergy could not be exempted from VAT pursuant to section 13 (1) of the VAT Act. 1, no. 1. The National Tax Court found that it had not been established that the proposed company provided services that were covered by the concept of “treatment of persons”, as the services had the character of advice rather than treatment. Furthermore, the National Tax Court also found that it had not been established that the treatment was to be carried out by persons who had the required professional qualifications, as the complainant was not trained in the treatment of persons. The National Tax Court therefore upheld the Tax Agency’s binding answer.
Source: skat.dk
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- Updated DAC7 and DAC8 Reporting Rules for Digital Platforms and Crypto-Asset Service Providers
- Denmark’s 2026 VAT Changes: Impact on Education, Fitness, and Mental Sports Activities
- Denmark’s Conservative Party Proposes Removing 25% VAT on Fruits and Vegetables to Lower Costs
- Denmark Finalizes SAF-T 2.0 Consultation, Prepares for Enhanced Digital Accounting Standards
- Denmark Launches Consultation on SAF-T 2.0
