Yet again we see HMRC equating outside the scope income with an input tax restriction. There is a lot of confusion from HMRC about what constitutes a direct link (can you even have a direct link to something that is not a supply) and it is a bit surprising that HMRC, having fought Frank A Smart all the way to the SC, losing at every stage, has decided to re run the same argument again in this FTT, presumably expecting to get a different answer. Einstein said that is the definition of madness. (Source KPMG)
Source Bailii
Latest Posts in "United Kingdom"
- Isle of Wight NHS Trust vs HMRC: VAT Exemption Dispute on Locum Medical Practitioners
- HMRC Guidance: How to correct VAT errors and make adjustments or claims (VAT Notice 700/45)
- Supreme Court Decision Mandates Prudential to Pay VAT on £9.3 Million Success Fees
- UK Supreme Court Rules on VAT Grouping and Time of Supply in Prudential Case
- High Court Rules in Favor of Hotelbeds UK on Input Tax Recovery Without VAT Invoices