A business that has a foreign presence may have a fixed establishment in that country. A fixed establishment is characterized by a sufficient degree of permanence and a suitable structure in terms of human an technical resources to receive or supply services. On the 3 of June the Court of Justice published its ruling in the eagerly awaited Titanium case (case no. C-931/19) in which it provided clarity on the concept of a fixed establishment. In the Titanium case the question was whether there could be a fixed establishment without the deployment of own personnel, in the situation of letting an immovable property with the assistance of an independent intermediary. If you are carrying out cross-border activities this case might be relevant for your business. For the VAT implications of having a fixed establishment we refer to our earlier article on this matter.
Source: BDO
For other posts about this case, please click here.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- ECJ Case: VAT Treatment of Loyalty Points vs Vouchers Under EU Directive
- FISC Hearing on Tax Implications of Trump Administration Policies September 23
- VAT Rules for Virtual Game Currencies: EU Court Advocate General Opinion
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: AG Opinion on Taxation of Virtual Gold in Online Gaming
- Briefing document & Podcast: ECJ C-564/15 (Farkas) – Non-application Reverse-Charge, 50% tax penalty is disproportionate
