The Hon’ble Madras High Court in M/s. D. Y. Beathel Enterprises v. the State Tax Officer [W.P. (MD) Nos. 2127, 2117, 2121, 2152, 2159, 2160, 2168, 2177, 2500, 2530, 2532, 2534, 2538, 2539, 2540, 2503 & 2504 of 2021 & Ors., dated February 24, 2021] quashed the order passed by the officer levying the entire tax liability on the purchasing dealer without involving the seller, where the payment of tax has been made by the purchasing dealer, but the same has not been remitted to the Government by the Seller. Held that, the omission on the part of the Seller to remit the tax should have been viewed very seriously and strict action ought to have been initiated against the seller.
Source Taxguru
Latest Posts in "India"
- Industry Threatens Strike from January 15 Over Delayed GST Refunds
- Import of Restricted IT Hardware – Update
- Gujarat HC: Transfer of Industrial Leasehold Rights Not Taxable Under GST
- Kerala HC: IGST Credit in Electronic Ledger Can Offset CGST, SGST Liabilities and Vice Versa
- Gujarat HC: Refund of Compensation Cess ITC Allowed on IGST-Paid Exports, Statute Prevails
