The Supreme Court declared X’s appeal in cassation unfounded. The 2006 VAT Directive did not preclude a system in which the pro rata according to actual use was only applied in cases – but in principle in all cases – in which it appeared that the pro rata according to turnover ratio produced a result contrary to reality. The Supreme Court declared X’s appeal in cassation unfounded.
Source: FUTD
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Decision on Tax Rate for Art Products: Classification and Maker Status Dispute
- Tax Deduction Dispute: Business Use of Apartment and VAT Reclaim Rights in Court Ruling
- Peppol E-Invoicing in the Netherlands: Digital Transformation and Future Integration Strategies
- Guidelines for New VAT Rules on Mixed-Use Properties Effective from July 2025
- 7 Tips to Speed Up VAT Return Processing and Minimize Delays
