According to the Court of Appeal, X’s activities could not be classified as anything other than performances that could be classified under the exemption of Article 11 (1) (f), Wet OB both on the basis of the text of the national provisions and on the apparent intention of the directive provision underlying the national exemption, which referred to services closely related to social work and social security.
Source: futd.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT on Free Social Media Access Still Uncertain Amid Ongoing EU Discussions
- New DAC7 Portal for Reporting Platform Seller Data Available from February 2026
- BBB Criticizes ‘Tulip Tax’: Higher VAT on Floriculture Threatens Jobs and Affordability
- Netherlands Delays VAT on ‘Free’ Social Media Services Amid European Debate and Legal Uncertainty
- Parliamentary Questions on VAT for Social Media: Response to FD Article and European Developments
