Source curia
AG Opinion
1. Article 47 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union must be interpreted as meaning that a decision by which an authority requested to provide assistance pursuant to Directive 2011/16/EU of 15 February 2011 on administrative cooperation in the field of taxation and repealing Directive 77/99/EEC requires a person to provide information concerning a taxpayer or third party may be challenged by that person, the taxpayer and third parties concerned before the courts of the requested Member State.
2. Article 1(1) and Article 5 of Directive 2011/16 must be interpreted as meaning that the requesting authority must state the reasons for the request for information in order to enable the requested authority to assess whether the requested information is not manifestly lacking in foreseeable relevance to the tax assessment conducted by the requesting authority. The request must provide concrete evidence of the facts or transactions that are relevant for tax purposes, so as to rule out an impermissible ‘fishing expedition’.
Newsletters
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- CJEU Rules on Overstated VAT and Correction Rights for Simplified B2C Invoices in C-794/23
- General Court Expands Triangular VAT Simplification, Rejects German Tax Authority’s Restrictive Interpretation
- CBAM Import Requirements and Permit Procedures Effective from January 1, 2026
- Comments on GC T-646/24: Simplification measure for triangular transactions applicable to fourth link in the chain
- Comments on T-643/24: Playing Music Without Required License Is a Taxable Service













