The fact that plaintiff imports the goods as part of its mediation activities is without prejudice to the fact that the goods are not intended for her. In that case, the reverse charge mechanism of article 23 of the Dutch VAT act cannot be applied. However, even if it were assumed that the defendant’s claim would succeed, no turnover tax can be imputed to the plaintiff. If the goods are destined for the plaintiff, she is also entitled to deduction . On balance, the claimant does not owe any turnover tax and therefore there is no question of under-payment of turnover tax.
Source: rechtspraak.nl
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- Court Ruling on VAT Deduction for School Renovation and Penalty Assessment, 20 March 2026
- Dutch Ornamental Horticulture VAT to Rise from 9% to 21% Starting January 2028
- Tax Assessment Upheld for Municipality Due to VAT Abuse in “School Model” Construction Scheme
- Scope of Reverse-Charge Scheme for Subcontracted Agricultural Work on Immovable Property by Contractors
- Management services for industry-wide pension fund taxed with VAT
