- The case concerns whether a sectoral pension fund (eiseres) correctly paid VAT on management services provided by foreign asset managers.
- The main issue is whether the pension fund qualifies as a “common investment fund” under Dutch VAT law, specifically if its participants bear the investment risk.
- The court ruled that the pension fund does not qualify as a common investment fund because it was not proven that participants bear the investment risk.
- Pension funds are generally not considered investment funds for VAT exemption, but can be under certain conditions according to EU case law.
- Relevant EU case law (ATP and BPL judgments) states that participants must primarily bear the investment risk for the VAT exemption to apply.
Source: uitspraken.rechtspraak.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Netherlands"
- VAT reverse charge mechanism and owner-buildership: overall management prevails over full outsourcing
- Mediation in Healthcare Property Purchases Qualifies as VAT-Taxable Service, Court Rules
- Excessive VAT Penalty Reduced for Entrepreneur Using Self-Billing by Customer, Court Rules
- Important Information: New Rabobank Account Numbers for Dutch Tax Payments from May 2026
- Dutch EU VAT Refund Portal Migration Delayed: Continue Using Existing System Until Further Notice














