- Tax authorities made discretionary increases to the taxpayer’s business income for 2015 and 2016 based on bank deposits.
- Deductions for 2015 were allowed only with documentation; no deductions were allowed for 2016 due to lack of accounting records.
- The taxpayer argued for additional deductions and exclusion of certain deposits from income, submitting new records for 2016 during the trial.
- The court found the taxpayer’s evidence insufficient and upheld the tax authorities’ estimates.
- The Ministry of Taxation was acquitted.
Source: info.skat.dk
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Denmark"
- VAT Refund Denied: Photographs Not Considered Works of Art Under Danish Tax Law
- Share Sales in Real Estate Portfolio Not Considered Ancillary for VAT Deduction Purposes, Tax Board Rules
- VAT Liability of Short Professional Training Courses in Body Therapy – Not Exempt as Vocational Education
- Right to Reopen Estate Tax Cases After Practice Overruled, Without Awaiting Official Guidance
- Psychotherapist Training VAT-Exempt, But Not Exempt from Payroll Tax, Rules Danish Tax Council
