- The TEAC ruled that the special pro-rata VAT regime cannot be applied retroactively if the taxpayer did not opt for it within the legal deadline after the 2013 regulation reform.
- The option for the special pro-rata is an irrevocable tax choice that must be exercised in time; otherwise, only the general pro-rata applies.
- In the reviewed case, a real estate developer failed to formally opt for the special pro-rata, so the AEAT’s regularization applying the general pro-rata was upheld.
- The inspection found the company carried out both VAT-taxable and VAT-exempt operations due to land expropriations, requiring the use of the general pro-rata for VAT deduction.
- The TEAC confirmed that, unless the special pro-rata is mandatory, late election is not allowed and the general pro-rata must be applied.
Source: allyon-etl.es
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "Spain"
- Choice Between General and Special VAT Pro-Rata Is a Taxpayer Option, Supreme Court Rules
- Inclusion of Expropriated Property Deliveries in VAT Pro-Rata Calculation for Real Estate Developers
- EU Takes Action Against France and Spain Over VAT and Tax Directive Compliance Issues
- EU Court Upholds Spain’s Ban on VAT Deduction for Client Hospitality and Sports Event Tickets
- Supreme Court: No Retroactive VAT Adjustment for Investment Goods in Simulated Transactions
