Expensive consequences of using the wrong VAT number in an intra-community transaction
Can showing VAT on an invoice contrary to the rules of taxation of intra-Community supplies change the tax situation of both parties to the transaction?
- The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that using the wrong VAT number in intra-community transactions can result in both the supplier and the purchaser being liable for VAT due to incorrect invoicing, even if the transaction should be exempt from VAT.
- The judgment clarified that Article 41 and Article 203 of the VAT Directive can be applied simultaneously, allowing a Member State to tax an intra-community acquisition if the taxable person used their VAT number, regardless of erroneous VAT displayed on invoices.
- The Court emphasized the importance of correcting invoicing errors to maintain the principle of neutrality and proportionality in the VAT system, indicating that mechanisms for correction prevent unjustifiable taxation and ensure compliance with VAT regulations.
Source MDDP
Click on the logo to visit the website
- Incorrectly invoiced VAT on intra-Community supplies can create multiple VAT liabilities: one from the invoice itself and another from the “safety net” mechanism if the wrong VAT number is used.
- The General Court confirmed that both liabilities can legally coexist, even if this results in what feels like double taxation in the same Member State.
- This outcome arises from two separate legal mechanisms: Article 203 VAT Directive (VAT liability from invoice) and Article 41 VAT Directive (safety net for intra-Community acquisitions).
- The case highlights the complexity and potential pitfalls in the intra-Community VAT system, especially regarding the use of VAT numbers and correct invoicing.
Source: vat-consult.be
Click on the logo to visit the website
See also
General Court Ruling on VAT and Intra-Community Acquisitions (T-638/24)
- The Austrian company D GmbH incorrectly deducted Austrian VAT on goods transported to other EU Member States, as suppliers invoiced VAT despite the transactions being classified as exempt intra-Community acquisitions.
- The German tax authorities deemed the transactions as intra-Community acquisitions taxable in Austria, leading to a refusal to deduct input tax, prompting D GmbH to challenge this decision on the grounds of proportionality and fiscal neutrality.
- The General Court ruled that VAT Directive provisions allow for taxation of intra-Community acquisitions in the Member State of departure, clarifying that supplier tax liability arises from incorrect invoicing rather than the actual taxability of the transaction, ensuring VAT neutrality is maintained.
Source BTW Jurisprudentie
- Join the Linkedin Group on ECJ/CJEU/General Court VAT Cases, click HERE
- VATupdate.com – Your FREE source of information on ECJ VAT Cases
- Podcasts & briefing documents: VAT concepts explained through ECJ/CJEU cases on Spotify
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-409/24 to C-411/24: Accommodation landlords must split supplies for VAT purposes
- Comments on ECJ C-472/24: Court Rules Virtual Gold Not Exempt from VAT
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers
- CJEU Rules Loyalty Points Are Not Vouchers for VAT Purposes in Lyko Case
- EU to Publish First CBAM Certificate Price on 7 April 2026















