- Advocate General Brkan opined that credit management services provided by the originator after transferring loans to a securitisation vehicle are not VAT-exempt under the EU VAT Directive.
- If the EU General Court follows this opinion, SPVs in securitisation or covered bond transactions will likely face irrecoverable VAT costs on credit management services, as they cannot deduct input VAT.
- Organisations involved in loan securitisation should review their arrangements and assess potential VAT impacts.
- This is an Advocate General’s opinion, not a binding judgment, but the EU General Court often follows such opinions.
- The case arose from a Finnish bank’s practice of selling loans to a subsidiary while continuing to manage them, with the VAT exemption for such management now in question.
Source: pwc.nl
Note that this post was (partially) written with the help of AI. It is always useful to review the original source material, and where needed to obtain (local) advice from a specialist.
Latest Posts in "European Union"
- Comments on ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Transfer pricing and VAT: Court confirms in Stellantis that not every true-up constitutes a service
- ECJ Customs C-307/23 (G GmbH) – Judgment – EU-Designed Label Templates Must Be Included in Customs Value as Container Costs
- ECJ C-603/24 (Stellantis Portugal) – Judgment – Transfer price adjustment not VATable service without direct link.
- Podcast Pawel Mikula & David Hummel: Inside the CJEU – What really happens behind the scenes?
- Comments on ECJ C-436/24 (Lyko): Court Rules Loyalty Points Do Not Qualify as Vouchers













